Abstract
According to S.O. Toroshina, the definition of creativity through the qualities of a person, as well as through a product, reduces the value of creativity itself, and also provides a reason to associate this phenomenon not with general patterns that are common to all people, but to classify only individual people who have certain qualities as creative people. The researcher believes that if creativity is expressed through certain qualities of a person, then the whole problem becomes impoverished. Thanks to this approach, the interest and attention of researchers is reduced not only to the very process of creation, but also to such issues as the upbringing and development of creative abilities, and in practice everything is limited only to identifying certain abilities with the help of tests [1].
References
Toroshin S.O. Modern idea of creativity // Psychological journal. - 2012, No. 5. - S. 112-120.
Ignatov K.V. The structure of creativity // Questions of psychology. - 2002, No. 1, S. 176 - 188.
Ivanova G.N. Wit and creativity // Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology. - 2012, No. 4. - S. 166 - 174.
Lebedev A.O. Manifestation of creativity in professional activity // Psychological and pedagogical aspects of the educational process. - 2010, No. 2. - S. 58 - 69
Zolotukhin D.A. Creative manifestations of personality in pedagogical activity // Psychology and Pedagogy of Vocational Education. - 2009, No. 5. - S. 114 - 121.
Gavrilov M.S. Student creativity // World of Pedagogy and Psychology. - 2011, No. 3. - S. 119 - 126.
Loseva R.S. Creative possibilities of the teacher // Modern Pedagogy and Psychology. - 2009, No. 4. - S. 101 - 112.
Lukyanova O.R. Self-regulation of the teacher's activity in crisis situations of pedagogical interaction // Uchitel. - No. 5. - 2012 March - April. - P.111-119.
Bialystok E., Luk G., Peets K.F., Yang S. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children // Biling (Camb Engl). 2010 Oct; 13(4): 525-531. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990423