Keywords
Abstract
The current article discusses some effectiveness and priorities in writing classes in teaching English language. The article covers ample theoretical data on rubrics of writing assessment and practical experiment done in language university of Uzbekistan covering language and literature teacher. The study aims to focus more comprehension of writing pieces and task fulfillment of student by means of writing rubrics.
References
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Metacognition in writing: Facilitating writer awareness. In A. Stubbs & J.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18
Chapman (Eds.), Rhetoric, uncertainty, and the university as text: How students construct the academic experience (pp. 10-30). Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). Newyork: Routledge.
Crehan, K. D. (1997). A discussion of analytic scoring for writing performance assessments. Annual Meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Association.
Hudelson, E. (1923). The development and comparative values of composition scales. The English Journal, 12(3), 163−168.
Schafer, W. D., Swanson, G., Bené, N., & Newberry, G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(2), 151–170
Stevens, D.D., & Levi, A.J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Stiggins, R.J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolcott, W., & Legg, S. M. (1998). An overview of writing assessment: Theory, research and practice. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.