LANGUAGE PROPOSAL FOR PRESCHOOLERS. A CASE IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Gulmira Ganieva Golibjon kizi

Keywords:

Language policy, language proposal, bilingual education, monolingual education, actors, Mother Tongue Language (MTL), Grammar Translation Method (GTM), Common European Framework Reference (CEFR), International English Language Testing System (IELTS), inventory, innovative teaching, funding

Abstract

The quality education in the early years is pivotal to children’s future outcomes. In Uzbekistan, English is the most widely learned foreign language. However, the existing language education in the kindergartens has not shown positive results among preschoolers. This work investigates the language education process in kindergartens in Uzbekistan and offers a language learning proposal.

References

Baldauf, Jr. R. B. 2006. Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2), 147-170 DOI: 10.2167/cilp092.0

Kaiser, D. (2018). Growing Your Own Onion: Teachers as Writers of Language Planning

and Policy Proposals. Draft article. doi.org/10.4324/9780203836507.ch54

Kaplan, R.B. (2011). Macro language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in

second language teaching and learning: Volume 2 (924-935). New York: Routledge.

Pearson. 2014. The Learning Curve. Retrieved from http://thelearningcurve.pearson.com/index/ index-ranking

Sandra Pinhui Wu. 15 Translation of language policy from pre-school to primary school in Singapore: Multiplayers at work

https://www.examenglish.com/grammar/a1_grammar.html

https://support.cambridgeenglish.org/hc/en-gb/articles/202838506-Guided-learning-hours

Ajoke, R. A. (2017). The Importance of Instructional Materials in Teaching English as a Second Language

Entz, S. (2015). Why Pedagogy Matters: The Importance of Teaching In A Standards-Based Environment, Hawaii Community College

Downloads

Published

2022-11-08